Proverbs 18:13 again comes to mind with your tweets regarding what is happening at McLean Bible Church. ( Editor’s note: As far as we know, this is as close as Beth Moore came to admitting she was wrong about Sandmann.) You owe him that for judging him before the facts. I am not even on Twitter, but I wonder if you ever apologized to him for your unkind comments in your tweet? Considering you criticized him publicly, I would hope that you apologized publicly. I don’t follow you, or any other high profile persona. I don’t have a copy of that video but I am sure you can at least read the court case-certain media outlets had to pay damages. Later as other video surfaced showing that it was indeed a setup, he was exonerated in a court of law. Surely she knows Proverbs 18:13? “He who answers a matter before he hears it, It is folly and shame to him.” I remember reading it over and over, thinking how can she even comment on this incident not knowing the young man or all the facts. I can’t remember your exact words but it had something to do with his demeanor showing arrogance or disrespect. I read your tweet related to Nicholas Sandmann’s encounter with the older Native American. Let me address a couple of incidences that concerned me: 1) the Nicholas Sandmann incident and 2) the McLean Bible Church one. You seemed angry, almost bitter, as you continually called for accountability from male church leaders and now worldly justice. Following that, I have been shocked at the change in your demeanor. In fact, I have thought of reaching out to you since the last study I took of yours, Entrusted. I don’t know you personally, but I wanted to reach out to you after reading some of your tweets that appeared in an article on Capstone Report. In one example, she pits the words of the Apostle Paul against the words of Jesus.Did Beth Moore only have one side of the story when she tweeted about David Platt and turmoil at McLean Bible Church?Īn Open Letter to Beth Moore from Nina, a former member of McLean Bible Church: She also pits Scripture against other Scripture and tries to force them to contradict each other. Romans 3:11 says “no one understands no one seeks for God.” We are born in a state of rebellion against God, with a sin nature.
What Beth Moore fails to acknowledge, though, is that we are not born with a drive to seek out the things of God. Comparing Adam to the creation of the “very first search engine,” Moore asserts that people are “born with a drive to seek out the things that are of God.” One example of this is by arguing that people are inherently good and are “born with a drive to seek God.” Beth Moore makes a strange comparison of man to search engines. Yet, in one of the rare situations where Beth Moore actually wrote something biblically sound and true - a clear position on the sinfulness of homosexuality - she later retracts the statement and insists that she’s “exceeded Scripture” and then said that by writing that, she was “doing more harm than good.”īeth Moore consistently contradicts Scripture–she does so because she knows that the way she says things will be popular with her gullible audiences. She also insisted that God told her in a dream to go to a bus stop she’d never been to before, find a random woman, and give her money.
0 kommentar(er)
